An Arrogance of Psychologists

On one of the major social network sites there is a thread running at the moment – it has been running for 4 months in fact – based on a simple question “What is the best way to treat phobia?”  In fact, there is far more to the original question than would appear at first but let’s just stay with the question in its base form.  It has elicited 114 replies, including one from me, and still has currency on the site with comments coming in daily.  What is striking – some would stay staggering – is the degree of ignorance shown in the responses, all of which come from Psychologists, Psychotherapists or Counsellors.  The ignorance is not in terms of a model of treatment or in the therapists’ confidence in applying their particular skills to the problem, but in the “I’m right and you’re wrong” way they have approached it.  Of the 114 responses there are well over 30 different therapies promoted as “the only way to treat phobia”.  these include, in no particular order:

  • EFT
  • CBT
  • EMDR
  • HUMANISTIC
  • PSYCHODYNAMIC
  • HUMAN GIVENS
  • NLP
  • REALITY THERAPY
  • SYSTEMATIC DESENSITISATION
  • EXPOSURE
  • TIME LINE THERAPY
  • RAPID RESOLUTION THERAPY
  • TFT
  • DBT
  • GESTALT
  • MI
  • BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION
  • OST
  • ERP
  • LOGOSYNTHESIS
  • HYPNOTHERAPY
  • PSYCHIC HEALING
  • THOUGHT FIELD THERAPY
  • PRIVATE SUBCONSCIOUS HEALING
  • ACT
  • T-R
  • MEDICATION

By the end of it, I’m quite surprised we haven’t also heard from proponents of homeopathy, dowsing, reiki, Hopi ear candles, reflexology or others in the same vein.

My own response was howled down by 2 psychologists; I had said “The only effective therapy will be one that is congruent with the patient/client. Everybody seems to want to promote “their” approach, but in fact we should all know by now that the evidence shows that many therapies can be equally effective so long as the chosen modality is firstly congruent with the client and secondly congruent with the therapist’s training and professional competence. I do agree completely that the client must have realistic expectations, be motivated, be available and trust the programme.” I carefully avoided suggesting that one therapy was “The Best”.  The replies centred around a view of me and people who think like me that can be summed up by one psychologist who clearly thinks he’s in a war zone: “a bunch of talking heads with no hearts. These folks then do most of the studies that are preached from while the real healers are out in the trenches healing quietly” In fact, the person who wrote that is by far the largest single contributor of comments to the thread.  It was so interesting to see on his website that he has written several articles on Narcissism – who says Americans have no sense of irony?

What was so depressing was the way in which so many of the respondents sold their snake-oil remedies with no concept of the person on the receiving end – and it so often was a receiving end rather than a collaborative effort – turning therapy into a battlefield for credibility and hence, presumably, income.

For a person who has a phobia the problems can be enormous or in fact can be trivial – some phobias only emerge in extremely rare situations, so as not to interfere with daily living, whereas others go to the heart of how a person lives life.  What saddens me is that access to good effective therapy is extremely limited and clients don’t normally have the resources to work their way through 30 different therapies to find the one that fits.  Whilst the psychologists bicker, the phobic clients suffer.  Everyone is ill-served by a profession that is so enmeshed in internecine warfare.

Looking at the history of psychotherapy, since its earliest identifiable days, it has been typified by schism.  A group of therapists are like stem cells – they will divide and divide, going on to produce things that are in no way like their starting point and often with no relation to each other.  The trouble is they don’t create a functional organism but rather a series of disparate warring factions who look for opportunities to diss each other’s therapies.

It seems to me that the best collective noun for a group of psychologists is ‘An Arrogance’

Advertisements

About allodoxaphobic

About me? What exactly do you want to know?
This entry was posted in Health, Mental Health, Psychology, Skeptic, Therapy and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to An Arrogance of Psychologists

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention An Arrogance of Psychologists | Allodoxaphobic's Blog -- Topsy.com

  2. i agree! Healing occurs as a result of building a trusting, safe therapeutic alliance! All the methods in the world will not help, if the foundation of trust and safety in the therpeutic realtionship is not present. Relying on a “magic method” is a “red flag”that therapist that lacks the emotional ability to be truly present with a client.

  3. Lola Snow says:

    “It seems to me that the best collective noun for a group of psychologists is ‘An Arrogance’”

    I am soooo stealing that! Genuinely made me laugh out loud 🙂

    Lola x

  4. Pingback: An Arrogance of Psychologists (via Allodoxaphobic’s Blog) « anihead

  5. Marina says:

    Thank you so much for this article. Reading it was a breath of fresh air for me. I am both, a therapist and a former therapy client, and my own thoughts on therapists’ general attitude towards healing have always paralleled yours 100%. That is why I was always seen as an “odd ball” by my colleagues. I too find this kind of arrogance and ignorance that you have described incomprehensible. I would even call it grandiosity, as those who believe that they are the ones who possess “the magical method” certainly regard themselves as gods completely denying their human limitations. By the way, what you have described is true not only for phobic clients but for all therapy clients.

    I like this particular thought in your post: “many therapies can be equally effective so long as the chosen modality is firstly congruent with the client and secondly congruent with the therapist’s training and professional competence.” I would also add to that “..and so long as the therapist is comfortable applying it”, because, as a therapist, I have to like what I am doing and it has to fit my personality, otherwise my work would not be effective at best and might be harmful at worst.

  6. anon says:

    See the recent NY Times article — especially the comments/replies at the bottom: http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/looking-for-evidence-that-therapy-works/

  7. I found the therapy to INCREASE my anxiety through its artificial, fictional “intimacy” and its magnification of my failings and wounds. Therapists could serve me boilerplate comfort to the horizon line, but that didn’t erase that THEY make the rules, control the game and never let me forget that I’m perennially their hopeless inferior in the dynamic.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s